Talk:Dr. Goodjob Events 2008
From MLB Power Pros Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→TRAJ Decrease / Signed + Fail) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I don't believe signing first affects anything.-Cownip | I don't believe signing first affects anything.-Cownip | ||
:Is that a hunch or fact? Typically, (by that I mean in previous Power Pros) signing the waiver should give bigger boosts at a higher risk. In 2007, this came in the form of the Yes/Challenge choice.--[[User:Odawali|Odawali]] 00:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC) | :Is that a hunch or fact? Typically, (by that I mean in previous Power Pros) signing the waiver should give bigger boosts at a higher risk. In 2007, this came in the form of the Yes/Challenge choice.--[[User:Odawali|Odawali]] 00:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I've confirmed signing gives more boosts to stats. Results summarized in chart.--[[User:Odawali|Odawali]] 10:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
=TRAJ Decrease / Signed + Fail= | =TRAJ Decrease / Signed + Fail= | ||
Can someone confirm this? I failed with 1 TRAJ so there was no going lower.--[[User:Odawali|Odawali]] 02:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | Can someone confirm this? I failed with 1 TRAJ so there was no going lower.--[[User:Odawali|Odawali]] 02:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Given the way the rest of the decreases mirror the boost in a successful outcome, I think it's likely.--[[User:Odawali|Odawali]] 23:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 23:22, 11 November 2008
Signing
I don't believe signing first affects anything.-Cownip
- Is that a hunch or fact? Typically, (by that I mean in previous Power Pros) signing the waiver should give bigger boosts at a higher risk. In 2007, this came in the form of the Yes/Challenge choice.--Odawali 00:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- I've confirmed signing gives more boosts to stats. Results summarized in chart.--Odawali 10:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
TRAJ Decrease / Signed + Fail
Can someone confirm this? I failed with 1 TRAJ so there was no going lower.--Odawali 02:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Given the way the rest of the decreases mirror the boost in a successful outcome, I think it's likely.--Odawali 23:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
