Guys, we're all on the same side. We're all creating players for a 6-year-old game and it's awesome. I'm sure no one means disrespect. Guys I created early on had a TON of blues before I knew how impactful they were...I created Brett Anderson while he was dominant early in his career, and now he's a fringy injury-riddled pitcher...we created guys like Lars Anderson based on minor league track record and hype and it was an overshot. Sometimes we'll be a little off, but we try our best, have fun doing it, and people use the players and appreciate it. Heck our players all look like the right guys at least - using some from the board, their DOB is way off, or their appearance is ridiculous (Madison Bumgarner as a latino for instance)...striving for accuracy is great, and while it can be tough when people disagree, it's all for the greater good.
Here's my $.02:
Last name is Rutledge - the title of the thread has "Rultledge", so best to be sure before you make him
CON - .259 avg = 7
PWR - 114 to 117 (career ISO .144, career HR% of 2%) - granted he hit 11 HRs at home and only 8 away, but that's not a huge split since he had around the same ABs for both. If you think Colorado gave him an extra 3, you can go with 110 power or so, but that's about it.
SPD 10-11
ARM 8-9
FLD 7-8 (B-R has him well into the negatives)
E RES 6-7 (fldg pctg consistently below average)
Strikeout percentage of 21% which is below our threshold for Free Swinger.
NO Vs. Lefty 4 - Rutledge has a negative platoon split, crazily.
He's shown decent base running/steal abilities so a blue there is fine IMO.