Power Pros Forum
https://www.mlbppworld.com/

NCAA Power Pros Development Thread
https://www.mlbppworld.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4684
Page 4 of 9

Author:  Paul McCartney15 [ Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

Me. I was away for a couple of days.

Author:  lanceberkman [ Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

Final Results:

High School-6
Fictional College-5
Real College-0 (1 vote, but nothing to back it up.)

I'll be doing High Schools. Thanks for the input guys.

Author:  Powerprosfan31 [ Fri Aug 12, 2011 11:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

I actually voted for college, but after thinking about it more, I'm glad high school won.

Author:  detroittigers15 [ Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

Powerprosfan31 wrote:
I actually voted for college, but after thinking about it more, I'm glad high school won.


Same here. Almost right after I voted, I thought about how it would work perfectly with there then being a "College Life" mode (as opposed to MLB Life).

Author:  lanceberkman [ Sat Aug 13, 2011 3:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

Glad to hear hear that everyone's satisfied with the way thing turned out.

Author:  lanceberkman [ Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

How should I go about getting game results for players?

A. Make up estimated guesses.
B. Take a player that's edited into Batting Practice and hit off of an appropriately edited pitcher.
C. Simulate a season game with the edited teams.

I'd like a bit of open discussion on this before I take the poll. So have at it!

Author:  detroittigers15 [ Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

B, but if you're short on time, A.

Author:  lanceberkman [ Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

FYI, I'll wait until I get a few opinions before I say my thoughts. Don't want to be tainting your opinions.

Author:  BrewersFuzz [ Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

Yeah, I think B is a good idea.

Author:  redsfan [ Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

B, that seems like the way to go.

Author:  Powerprosfan31 [ Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

I agree with dtigers, B, but if you can't do that, A

Author:  LightningMan117 [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

B seems that it will produce the most accurate results, but I can't imagine the time it would take. C would be next closest, but someone could have a bad game/the game could make illogical substitutions.

I'd go B

Author:  lanceberkman [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

Alright, I was thinking I would do B, unless you guys wanted me to lessen the importance of game stats, or not give any stat bonuses at all, then I could do A to save a little time. The only drawback with B, is that I don't think I'd be able to do more than about 20 players at a time, although I doubt that'll be much of an issue for the time being. There's something similar for pitcher's right? I'll have to to check it out sometime and make sure. I consider myself pretty consistently average with hitting, so I'm not too worried about that causing problems. Mainly figuring out how to do hitters first, since they're easier.

In case anyone was wondering, I won't be allowing reloading. It would just mess everything up and take too much time.

Author:  AgentP [ Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

A. It's easier for everyone.

Author:  lanceberkman [ Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: NCAA Power Pros Development Thread

New poll up. If there are any more questions, feel free to ask.

Page 4 of 9 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/